|
Texas
Straight Talk
www.house.gov/paul
Bailing
Out Banks
By
Rep. Ron Paul
April
15, 2008
There has been a
lot of talk in the news recently about the Federal Reserve and the
actions it has taken over the past few months. Many media pundits
have been bending over backwards to praise the Fed for supposedly
restoring stability to the market. This interpretation of the Fed's
actions couldn't be further from the truth.
The current market
crisis began because of Federal Reserve monetary policy during the
early 2000s in which the Fed lowered the interest rate to a
below-market rate. The artificially low rates led to overinvestment
in housing and other malinvestments. When the first indications of
market trouble began back in August of 2007, instead of holding back
and allowing bad decision-makers to suffer the consequences of their
actions, the Federal Reserve took aggressive, inflationary action to
ensure that large Wall Street firms would not lose money. It began
by lowering the discount rates, the rates of interest charged to
banks who borrow directly from the Fed, and lengthening the terms of
such loans. This eliminated much of the stigma from discount window
borrowing and enabled troubled banks to come to the Fed directly for
funding, pay only a slightly higher interest rate but also secure
these loans for a period longer than just overnight.
After the massive
increase in discount window lending proved to be ineffective, the
Fed became more and more creative with its funding arrangements. It
has since created the Term Auction Facility (TAF), the Primary
Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF), and the Term Securities Lending
Facility (TSLF). The upshot of all of these new programs is that
through auctions of securities or through deposits of collateral,
the Fed is pushing hundreds of billions of dollars of funding into
the financial system in a misguided attempt to shore up the
stability of the system.
The PDCF in
particular is a departure from the established pattern of Fed
intervention because it targets the primary dealers, the largest
investment banks who purchase government securities directly from
the New York Fed. These banks have never before been allowed to
borrow from the Fed, but thanks to the Fed Board of Governors, these
investment banks can now receive loans from the Fed in exchange for
securities which will in all likelihood soon lose much of their
value.
The net effect of
all this new funding has been to pump hundreds of billions of
dollars into the financial system and bail out banks whose poor
decision making should have caused them to go out of business.
Instead of being forced to learn their lesson, these poor-performing
banks are being rewarded for their financial mismanagement, and the
ultimate cost of this bailout will fall on the American taxpayers.
Already this new money flowing into the system is spurring talk of
the next speculative bubble, possibly this time in commodities.
Worst of all, the
Treasury Department has recently proposed that the Federal Reserve,
which was responsible for the housing bubble and subprime crisis in
the first place, be rewarded for all its intervention by being
turned into a super-regulator. The Treasury foresees the Fed as the
guarantor of market stability, with oversight over any financial
institution that could pose a threat to the financial system.
Rewarding poor performing financial institutions is bad enough, but
rewarding the institution that enabled the current economic crisis
is unconscionable.
|