|
Why
Not Let the Market Set Prices?
By
Peter Schiff europac.net
April
25, 2008
Those
unfamiliar with marketplace dynamics may not recognize how
government activity has created price distortions across our
economy. But
when these chains fail to restrain the market, the underlying forces
become easier to see.
Much
as government mandated easy credit propelled home prices to bubble
levels, similar forces pushed college tuitions up to the
stratosphere. Both
systems are currently breaking down along similar lines.
In
light of the staggering cost of college education today, it may seem
unbelievable that my father in the early 1950s was able to finance
his own education with a summer job waiting tables. Like
most in his generation, eight weeks of work per year allowed him to
graduate debt free. In contrast, the debt burden now heaped on
today’s college graduates is so oppressive that the financial
challenges are becoming a palpable psychological strain on an entire
generation.
The
irony is that without easy access to student loans, which have been
touted as a means to ease college affordability, tuitions never
could have risen so high in the first place. Sadly,
it is not students who have benefited, but the educational
establishment that receives the proceeds. Colleges collect
huge sums of money up front while students get saddled with
staggering balances.
Now
that repaying loans has become increasingly difficult for home
buyers and students (especially since the home equity well has run
dry and the employment market has cooled), more debtors are
defaulting. As a result, the market for securitized loans,
which has completely dried up in the mortgage market, is now equally
desolate for student loans. Here again, the government is being
asked to pick up the slack by buying existing student loans and
issuing new loans directly to students.
In
so doing, the government is helping to sustain high tuitions just as
similar actions are working to prop up real estate prices. If
the government stayed out of the student loan market, students would
not be denied educations. Colleges and universities would
simply be forced to offer affordable tuitions or go out of business
--just the way they used to back in my father’s day.
Similarly, if the government allowed real estate prices to collapse,
Americans would not have to take on so much debt to buy houses.
To
buy up all of these loans, the Fed is running the printing presses
non-stop. As a result, prices of other goods, such as food and
energy, are spiraling out of control.
Of
course, mainstream Wall Street firms and the conventional financial
media do not see this obvious connection. While CNBC searches
the world for clues to this “mystery”, no one sees the evidence
“hiding” in plain sight. Higher prices simply result from
all the money printing, both by the Fed and foreign central banks
trying to maintain currency pegs to a sinking dollar.
It
is amazing how those who were completely blindsided by the surge in
food prices are now so quick to come up with ridiculous reasons to
explain the phenomenon. However, for those of us who actually
understand what inflation is, predicting the current surge in food
prices was a no brainer. Read one of my commentaries from Oct. of 2006 and see for yourself.
Similarly,
analysts are blaming $120 oil on the hidden machinations of greedy
speculators. They
buttress these claims by noting that absent a bona fide oil
shortage, current prices are not justified by fundamentals.
This overlooks that while there is no shortage, there is also no
surplus. The
market is in perfect equilibrium at today’s price, and recent
spikes merely reflect the substantial increase in global money
supply. If today’s prices really were artificially high,
like house prices, they would be a glut of oil in storage facilities
while users, priced out of an inflated market, cut back on their
consumption (This is precisely what is happening in the
real estate market).
As
consumers are getting wise to inflation, they are beginning to stock
up on those products showing the most rapid price increases.
This week, Cosco and Sam’s Club began to limit bulk purchases of
rice. After all, if you have the cash why not by the things
you know you will need in the future now, before the prices go any
higher. My
guess is that if home storage were possible, consumers would be
buying as much gasoline and home heating oil as they could currently
afford…they might even load up their credit cards to do so.
After airfares (which unfortunately cannot be stockpiled), apparel
may be next major category of goods that will experience rapid price
increases. Why not buy a few extra pairs of socks while they
are still cheap?
As
the government creates more inflation, and prices for all sorts of
consumer goods spiral upward, the authorities,
as they always have, will institute price controls and other forms
of rationing of consumer staples. My advice is to stock up
now, before you end up having to spend hours waiting in line.
For
a more in depth analysis of the inherent dangers facing the U.S.
economy and the implications for U.S. dollar denominated
investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the
Coming Economic Collapse.” Click
here to order a copy today.
More
importantly, don’t wait for reality to set in.
Protect your wealth and preserve your purchasing power before
it’s too late.
Discover the best way to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com
, download
my free research report on the powerful case for investing in
foreign equities available at www.researchreportone.com, and subscribe to my free, on-line investment
newsletter.
© 2004-2008 Biiwii.com
Views
presented in guest articles are those of the authors and do not
represent those of Biiwii.com.
Biiwii.com
does not recommend that any trading or investment positions be taken
based on views expressed on this site. If you speculate or invest it
is suggested that you consult a financial advisor qualified in your
area of interest. For more detailed information and full terms of
service, see "About & Terms" here. |