|
Things
Fall Apart in Euro Zone
By
John Browne Senior
Market Strategist, Euro
Pacific Capital
January
12, 2010
As fears of a dollar meltdown have loomed ever
larger in recent years, major investors, including central banks, have moved significant
portions of their cash reserves into the euro, the currency of
the European Union (EU). And while it is true that the euro
offers some shelter from the American economic
catastrophe, the currency does come with baggage that investors
should not ignore.
Introduced as an accounting medium in 1990, the euro became an
actual currency in 1992. It is currently issued by 16 of the 27 EU
member countries, representing some 329 million people. With almost
$1 trillion in circulation, it is the world's largest physical
currency.
The birth of the euro was a stunning example of putting the
cart before the horse. When it was first issued as a physical
currency in 1999, the major states that participated were
not yet united. Many believe that this premature
introduction was done to hasten the political union. In
hindsight, the strategy was successful. The single currency removed
a key psychological barrier towards unification.
As soon as it made its debut, the euro quickly became the
second largest currency held in the official foreign reserves of
central banks. Major corporations and investors followed suit. By
September 2007, former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan said it would be
"absolutely conceivable that the euro will replace the dollar
as the dominant foreign reserve currency, or will be traded as an
equally important reserve currency."
However, the structural problems that were so heavily debated
at the birth of the EU remain unresolved. These
uncertainties may undermine the euro as a viable
dollar-alternative. Should recent economic strains continue
unchecked, investors, institutions, and central banks may move
heavily into gold as an ultimate "safe haven."
In the U.S., monetary union depends upon political union. When
California faces a crushing debt burden, it can neither print
its own highly inflationary currency to ease the pressure (though
its "IOU's" are a haphazard attempt) nor leave the union
to avoid this constraint. Thus, crises in U.S. states tend to push
states toward the central
government as they seek assistance from Uncle Sam. EU member states
similarly lack their own printing presses and are therefore unable
to monetize their problems. But in Europe, the emergency exit is
always open - states can leave if they believe their interests are
not being considered.
The EU does not have a common fiscal policy, so countries are
free to bankrupt themselves according to their own decree. But when
they do, there is no formal option of seeking a bailout from the
pan-European government. Even if such a road were
available under the EU treaties, the European Central
Bank, modeled on the famously inflation-wary German Bundesbank,
would be unwilling to monetize the additional spending.
Partially because of this stringent monetary policy, the euro has
risen by some 40 percent against the dollar since its launch. This
has severely hurt eurozone export economies like Spain, Portugal and
Italy, who have long relied on currency devaluation to subsidize
their manufacturers.
While countries like Germany, the world's largest exporter, have
been successful in utilizing the benefits of a strong currency
to continue selling products at a real profit, others have failed.
Indeed, both Italy and Greece now have government debts in
excess of GDP (115% and 113%, respectively). Furthermore,
Greece, with a budget deficit of some 12.7 percent of GDP, is now
threatened with default.
Although the EU, by and large, currently spurns talk of a
bailout for Greece, the debate will intensify if the economy
deteriorates further. If, in order to preserve union, the
EU does decide to bail out an individual member state, what
precedent would that set?
Germany, the strongest EU economy, found it a Herculean task to bail
out just 17 million people in the former East Germany. Could it even
contemplate bailing out not one, but several other EU member states,
without attendant political control?
There seems little room to move forward under the status quo. Though
the Lisbon Treaty (read: EU constitution) just came into effect, it
was passed without the mandate of citizen referenda. The member
states remain culturally distinct, the citizens have little
allegiance to the behemoth in Brussels, and, therefore, it seems
far-fetched that the EU would go to war to compel one of its members
to remain in the club. With little to glue it together, investors
are questioning whether the eurozone is strong enough to withstand
the shocks that would accompany a dollar collapse.
As the credibility of the U.S. dollar has eroded and that of the
euro is now suspect, it is likely that investors will continue their
quiet rush into gold. If so, silver is likely to become a store of
value for smaller investors and the small change of the rich. In
such a world, the price of silver could rise even faster than that
of gold.
John Browne
is the Senior Market Strategist for Euro Pacific Capital, Inc. Mr.
Brown is a distinguished former member of Britain's Parliament who
served on the Treasury Select Committee, as Chairman of the
Conservative Small Business Committee, and as a close associate of
then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Among his many notable
assignments, John served as a principal advisor to Mrs. Thatcher's
government on issues related to the Soviet Union, and was the first
to convince Thatcher of the growing stature of then Agriculture
Minister Mikhail Gorbachev. As a partial result of Brown's advocacy,
Thatcher famously pronounced that Gorbachev was a man the West
"could do business with." A graduate of the Royal Military
Academy Sandhurst, Britain's version of West Point and retired
British army major, John served as a pilot, parachutist, and
communications specialist in the elite Grenadiers of the Royal
Guard.
© 2004-2010 Biiwii.com
Views
presented in guest articles are those of the authors and do not
represent those of Biiwii.com.
Biiwii.com
does not recommend that any trading or investment positions be taken
based on views expressed on this site. If you speculate or invest it
is suggested that you consult a financial advisor qualified in your
area of interest. For more detailed information and full terms of
service, see "About & Terms" here. |