|
'Tug
of War'
By
Gary Tanashian
Biiwii.com
Biiwii.blogspot.com January
19, 2009
Excerpted
from the January 17 edition of Notes
From the Rabbit Hole
The
broad markets are at a critical juncture and as Mr. Alan Gayle
observes in the AP piece Wall Street rebounds after banks report
big losses: http://tinyurl.com/9ozq9z
“It’s that tug of war between problems and promise.”
Yes Alan, it is, except that I would qualify the problems as
being real and ultimately devastating and the promise as being
nothing more than the ‘hoped’ for technical rally that the
market is attempting in fits and starts.
The
NFTRH
working plan calls for global stock markets to stabilize, with
idealistic sentiment getting whooped up in anticipation of the
‘change’ that the new presidency will bring to the US and its
relations with the rest of the world.
The plan also considers the traumatic over sold condition on
weekly charts (with bullish divergence).
The markets are due, but will that translate into something
of substance?
Typically,
the banks should be leading the broad market but a look at the Bank
Index shows a red flag of bearish divergence to the broad market.
Or is it? Can
the wall of agony that the market is attempting to climb even as the
Piggies tank be a positive sign?
Yes it can, and I could see a ‘wall of worry’ pretense
get constructed to go along with the Obama ‘change we can believe
in’ (with all those old Clinton people helping orchestrate said change)
hysteria and general ‘the worst is over’ noise. This may of course lead up to a very good shorting
opportunity as hope
springs eternal. You
have got to love herd sentiment and group think if you actively
trade the stock markets.
The
BKX, representing the finest financial institutions of the illusion
known as the US financial system, just keeps on driving lower in a
tacit demand upon the new administration that ‘you will not change
anything with regard to reflation… you will dutifully carry on the
policies set in motion by the previous administration, or else’.
The
20 day exponential moving average of the CBOE Put/Call Ratio does
not inspire much confidence for a significant rise.
The SPX (black line) tends to rally strongly only after a
spike to the top line. Have
we already had that rally? The
little hitch higher to just under the 1.0 level does not provide a
good platform for a sustainable continuation.

The
structure of the CPC’s EMA 20 is negative because if it follows
its ‘normal’ pattern, any continued stock rally from this point
should be relatively weak, or a sustainable rally will begin only
after a drop back down to the .90 area, which would likely mean a
test of or breakdown below the November lows before said sustainable
rally begins. The minor
caveat for the bulls is that the historic panic events of October
and November have surely built some distortions into markets
relative to what is and is not ‘normal’.
But,
what of the broad market? Let’s
take a look at the daily status of the S&P 500.
The chart certainly does not inspire much confidence after
our broad market tolerance level was violated with the breakdowns
through the SMA 50 and EMA 20.
MACD
is triggering below zero and is bearish.
On the plus side, the market has had two up days in a row on
productive volume in the face of bad news, and hope is waiting to
get some play. The
market is over sold by short term indicators like the Full
Stochastics. I would
not hesitate to call the last two up days a bearish flag if not for
the relatively good volume and again, a weekly chart shows that the
post-holiday bearish action is but short term noise as the market
continues to grind out a would-be bottom.

The
conclusion is that a test of, or drop below the Q4 lows remains very
much in play short term. I
would expect that if the market continues to rally from here, it
would be a weak rally indeed. If however, a final plunge were to occur near term, driving
the CPC to a more productive level, we may get something of
substance eventually. Incidentally,
the VIX, which I hope to look at on the blog
again shortly, is in alignment with the CPC message.
There
are many wild cards in the mix including da boyz (AKA ‘the
goons’) settling back in after the low volume holiday melt up, a
historic presidency in ascension that will no doubt inspire historic
levels of hope following what was historic and climactic downside
action in a national Ponzi scheme of historic proportions.
If things play out according to plan, we will get another
chance at a historic shorting opportunity in a few months as being
short ‘hope’ could work well.
If,
on the other hand, the whole mess unravels in the face of the Obama
ascension and fear once again becomes acute, we may actually begin
to think about a brand new inflation-fueled bull market later in
2009 or in 2010. That,
or the end of the economic world as we know it. All or nothing as it were.
As
you know, as far as equities go, gold mining companies are by far my
first interest in the current climate for reasons illustrated below,
and all along during NFTRH’s
brief history. That is
because their product is acting as if it were sane money in a
monetary world gone insane even as these companies’ cost inputs
have gone through the floor in Armageddon ’08.
In fact, it appears that the fundamental picture is in
transition from the lonely few (including NFTRH) writing amid the
panic that ‘the same forces driving the USD higher and gold miner
stock prices lower are actually driving gold miner
fundamentals higher’ to an environment where this fact is
becoming more readily acknowledged in the investment mainstream.
But
there are other opportunities shaping up as the world considers
‘change’ and indeed does change.
Some opportunities will be ‘long’, some will be
‘short’ as a couple recent trades illustrate (successful
‘shorts’ were completed in long term treasuries and real
estate). Right here, in the middle of secular changes that the herd
barely perceives, we will find opportunity in the ongoing tug of war
that is likely to last a lot longer than the short term events
described by Mr. Gayle above.
© 2004-2009 Biiwii.com
Biiwii.com
does not recommend that any trading or investment positions be taken
based on views expressed on this site. If you speculate or invest it
is suggested that you consult a financial advisor qualified in your
area of interest. For more detailed information and full terms of
service, see "About & Terms" here. |